top of page
  • Ken A.

What is Less Than a Truck Load (LTL)?


What is Less Than a Truck Load (LTL)?

What is Less Than Truck Load (LTL)?

Less than truckload (LTL) freight shipping involves the transportation of goods in trailers shared with other shippers. This method is ideal for shipments that are too small to fill an entire truck trailer but too large for parcel carriers. By consolidating smaller shipments, LTL shipping helps reduce transportation costs while maximizing efficiency for all parties involved.


For a 3PL logistics company specializing in LTL services, several unique challenges emerge. Unlike full truckload (FTL) shipments, where a single shipper’s load fills the truck, LTL shipping involves combining loads from multiple customers into one truck. This requires sophisticated routing algorithms and load planning strategies to ensure each shipment is both cost-effective and timely. Optimizing these shipments while balancing truck capacity, transit times, and costs is a delicate task, often requiring advanced technology and expert logistics management.


Challenges in LTL Freight Shipping

LTL freight shipping presents several challenges that differentiate it from FTL services. One of the most critical challenges is visibility and tracking. Since LTL shipments contain goods from various shippers, monitoring individual shipments within a larger load can be complex. Ensuring real-time visibility requires a robust IT infrastructure, advanced tracking systems, and clear communication between the 3PL, carriers, and customers. Effective coordination ensures timely and accurate information regarding shipment status, which is vital for maintaining trust and transparency with customers.


Additionally, managing relationships with multiple carriers is essential for a successful LTL service. Unlike FTL shipments, which often rely on a single carrier, LTL services depend on a network of carriers handling different segments of the load. Coordinating schedules, capacities, and rates with these carriers requires expertise and careful negotiation, as well as stringent vetting to ensure safety and performance standards. Building strong, long-term relationships with these carriers helps 3PLs offer consistent and reliable LTL services.


Advantages of LTL Freight Shipping

Despite its challenges, LTL shipping offers several advantages, particularly for smaller shipments. The cost-effectiveness of LTL freight shipping is one of its most significant benefits. By consolidating multiple shipments into one trailer, overall transportation costs are reduced, making it an efficient option for smaller businesses or infrequent shippers.

Another advantage is flexibility. LTL freight shipping allows for pickups and deliveries from various locations, making it suitable for businesses with multiple suppliers or customers in different regions. Finally, LTL services offer convenience for shippers who lack their own fleets. With LTL, the carrier handles all transportation details, including pickup, delivery, and even freight insurance.


Disadvantages of LTL Freight Shipping

However, LTL freight shipping does have its downsides. Due to the consolidation of multiple shipments, delivery times can be longer compared to FTL shipping, especially for longer distances. Since LTL shipments share space with others, they may have to wait for other loads to be loaded or unloaded before they can be transported.


Another concern is the increased risk of damage. LTL shipments are handled more frequently, being transferred between various trucks and warehouses, which increases the chances of goods being damaged in transit. Additionally, limited tracking can pose a challenge for some shippers. While LTL carriers do offer tracking, it’s often not as detailed or frequent as that provided for FTL shipments, making it more difficult for customers to track their shipments in real-time.


What LTL Freight Shipping is Not

It’s essential to distinguish LTL freight shipping from parcel shipping. Parcel shipping is designed for small packages, typically weighing less than 150 pounds, and is usually handled by companies like UPS, FedEx, or USPS. LTL freight shipping, on the other hand, is used for larger shipments, typically weighing more than 150 pounds, and involves the consolidation of goods from multiple shippers into a single trailer.

Top Advantages of LTL Freight Shipping

To summarize, the top advantages of LTL freight loads include:

  • Cost-effectiveness: Consolidating shipments reduces transportation costs.

  • Flexibility: Shippers can send goods from and to various locations.

  • Convenience: LTL carriers handle transportation details, making it ideal for businesses without a dedicated fleet.


Navigating the Complexities of LTL Freight Services

Navigating LTL freight shipping requires addressing its complexities while capitalizing on its advantages. Companies need to mitigate the longer delivery times and the higher risk of damage while optimizing for cost and flexibility. Ensuring proper communication with carriers and customers, investing in robust IT systems, and building strong carrier networks are critical to overcoming these challenges and delivering value to shippers.



The Downfall of Yellow: A Real-World Study

Yellow Corporation, once one of the largest less-than-truckload (LTL) carriers in the United States, faced an unfortunate downfall in 2023, filing for bankruptcy after nearly a century of operations. Yellow's collapse marked a seismic shift in the LTL industry, leaving behind major disruptions for shippers, carriers, and the broader logistics landscape.


Yellow's downfall didn’t happen overnight; it was the result of years of financial struggles, operational inefficiencies, and mounting debt. Let’s look at the key numbers that illustrate its challenges:

  • Revenue Decline: In 2022, Yellow generated approximately $5.2 billion in revenue. However, this represented a significant decline from its peak revenue of $7 billion in 2019.

  • Debt Load: By 2023, Yellow carried over $1.6 billion in debt, with much of it tied to high-interest loans and obligations to union pension funds. This debt hampered Yellow's ability to invest in modernizing its fleet or upgrading its logistics systems.

  • Union Disputes: Yellow employed over 30,000 workers, including 22,000 Teamsters union members. Labor disputes and mismanagement led to ongoing conflicts, which further eroded its operational capabilities and trust within the organization.

  • Operational Inefficiencies: Yellow was notorious for its operational inefficiencies, such as outdated technologies and inconsistent customer service. While it controlled nearly 10% of the LTL market at its peak, its inability to keep pace with more agile competitors meant it gradually lost customers and market share.

  • Government Loan: In 2020, Yellow received a $700 million loan as part of the CARES Act due to its status as a critical supply chain partner for the U.S. Department of Defense. Despite this assistance, the company was unable to turn its operations around.


The Ripple Effects on the LTL Industry

The bankruptcy of Yellow has sent shockwaves through the LTL sector, creating significant disruptions and a reshuffling of market dynamics. Here’s how the LTL landscape might change as a result:

  1. Reduced Capacity in the Market

    • Yellow’s collapse has removed roughly 30,000 drivers and 15,000 trucks from the LTL market. This sudden reduction in capacity has left a substantial gap, leading to a tightening of available carriers and service routes for shippers across the country.

    • With fewer options, LTL freight rates are expected to rise as demand exceeds supply. Early data shows that LTL shipping rates increased by as much as 15-25% in the months following Yellow’s shutdown.

  2. Increased Pressure on Remaining LTL Carriers

    • Major competitors like XPO Logistics, Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL), and FedEx Freight have seen an influx of business as they scramble to absorb the displaced shipments. However, these carriers face challenges in quickly scaling up to meet the increased demand, potentially leading to service disruptions and delays.

    • The sudden surge in volume has forced some carriers to prioritize higher-margin customers, leaving small shippers and certain geographic regions underserved.

  3. Supply Chain Disruptions

    • Yellow’s exit from the market has created a ripple effect through multiple industries, especially those dependent on LTL services for distribution and supply chain operations. Industries such as retail, automotive, and manufacturing are experiencing longer lead times and higher costs as they scramble to adjust.

    • Companies that had long-term contracts with Yellow have been forced to renegotiate terms with other carriers, often at higher prices and less favorable service conditions.

  4. Shifts in LTL Industry Dynamics

    • Consolidation: Yellow’s bankruptcy might accelerate consolidation within the LTL sector as smaller and mid-sized carriers are either acquired or struggle to compete in a tighter market. Larger carriers may gain greater control over market pricing and terms.

    • Technological Adoption: The collapse of Yellow, in part due to its inability to modernize, is a wake-up call for the industry. Companies that fail to invest in digital freight management systems, advanced tracking, and dynamic routing may find themselves at a similar risk. As a result, LTL carriers are expected to accelerate their adoption of technology to enhance efficiency and customer satisfaction.


Long-Term Impacts on LTL Freight Shipping: Yellow’s demise could change the world of LTL freight

  • Higher Rates, Less Competition: With one of the largest players gone, the reduced competition in the market could lead to permanently higher shipping rates. This would impact small businesses the hardest, as they rely heavily on LTL services to move goods cost-effectively.

  • Stronger Carriers Could Emerge Dominant: Companies like Old Dominion, XPO, and FedEx Freight may seize this opportunity to expand their market share, resulting in a few dominant carriers controlling a large portion of the LTL market. This could lead to stricter service terms and less flexibility for shippers, as these major players may become less inclined to negotiate on price or service options.

  • Increased Reliance on 3PLs: With fewer direct LTL carriers available, more shippers may turn to third-party logistics providers (3PLs) to manage their freight needs. 3PLs can help businesses navigate the shrinking carrier pool and provide more creative shipping solutions, though this could add layers of cost and complexity.

  • Shift Toward Regional Carriers: Yellow’s absence may also spur the growth of regional LTL carriers that focus on specific markets. These smaller carriers could offer more tailored services and flexibility, particularly for businesses that don’t need national coverage. The challenge for these regional players will be scaling their operations efficiently without falling into the same pitfalls as Yellow.


Conclusion: The Future of LTL Freight Post-Yellow

Yellow's collapse has left a lasting mark on the LTL industry, highlighting both the vulnerabilities and opportunities in the sector. While the immediate effects include higher costs and capacity shortages, the long-term impact will depend on how the remaining players adapt to the new dynamics. Carriers will need to invest in technology, expand networks, and maintain operational efficiency to avoid a similar fate. As the industry evolves, shippers and 3PLs will have to adjust to a more consolidated and potentially more expensive LTL market, making strategic planning and partnerships more crucial than ever.


This analysis provides both a real-world look at Yellow’s downfall and a discussion of how its exit may reshape the LTL freight industry in the years to come. Let me know if you'd like to add more data or details to any specific area!



- Ken A.

Comments


Commenting has been turned off.
bottom of page